Heading Structure Analyzer
Analyze your page's heading hierarchy for SEO and accessibility. Detect missing H1 tags, skipped levels, and get recommendations for better structure.
Analyze your page's heading hierarchy for SEO and accessibility. Detect missing H1 tags, skipped levels, and get recommendations for better structure.
Most of the heading advice you read online is wrong, or at least wildly out of date. The classic rule was: one H1 per page, then H2s, then H3s, never skip a level. That rule comes from the HTML4 outline, which browsers and screen readers still rely on. It does not come from Google. Google has been on record for years saying multiple H1s are fine and that they treat headings as one signal among many, not as a strict outline they walk top to bottom.
The reason heading structure still matters is screen readers. People who use VoiceOver, NVDA, or JAWS navigate a page by jumping heading to heading with a single keystroke. If your H2 is followed by an H5 because the H5 happened to be styled the way the designer wanted, that user lands somewhere confusing and bounces. WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 1.3.1 covers this directly, and your legal exposure on accessibility has gone up sharply in the last few years.
The other reason to care is that headings are how you signal subtopic structure to whatever is parsing your page next, and right now that includes more than Googlebot. AI overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT browsing, and every other extractor reads headings as section boundaries. They use them to decide which chunk of your page answers a given query. Get the hierarchy wrong and they grab the wrong paragraph, or skip your page entirely in favor of one that is easier to chunk.
What this tool does is pull the rendered DOM, walk every heading from H1 through H6, and flag the patterns that actually matter: more than one H1, skipped levels, empty headings, headings used purely for font sizing, and headings buried inside elements that screen readers ignore. It does not lecture you about ideal length. It tells you what is structurally broken, what is borderline, and what is fine but worth a second look before you publish.
One last thing worth saying out loud. The HTML5 outline algorithm, the one that was supposed to let you nest sections and reset heading levels per section, was never implemented by any browser or assistive technology. So even though your spec-purist friend insists it is fine to have five H1s wrapped in five article tags, in practice the document outline that screen readers and bots see is still the flat one. Build for that.
You wrote the copy in a doc, the designer styled it in Figma, and somewhere between those two steps the H2 became a span with a class of heading-2. Run the page once before launch to catch the gap between what looks like a heading and what is actually marked up as one.
WordPress to Webflow, Shopify theme swap, headless rebuild. Heading structure is the first thing that breaks because templates handle the wrapper element differently. You usually find out months later when an accessibility audit lands on your desk.
If Google or Perplexity is quoting a sentence from your page that is not the answer you wanted them to surface, your section structure is the first place to look. The extractor walks headings to decide what a section is about. Bad headings, wrong chunk picked.
Pillar pages, guides, anything over 2000 words. The risk of skipped levels and stylistic heading abuse goes up linearly with length, and so does the cost of getting it wrong because more of the page depends on the structure being legible.
Drop a competitor URL in and you get a clean outline of their page in about three seconds. It is the fastest way to see how they structured a topic, which subheadings they prioritized, and whether their hierarchy is actually as tight as the SERP snippet suggests.
Audit H1–H6 hierarchy for accessibility and SEO.
Enter any URL to extract its full heading tree.
See all H1–H6 in document order with warnings for skips and duplicates.
Re-arrange headings so each level descends logically from the H1.
A standalone callout in the sidebar that says "Free shipping" should not be an H3 because the designer wanted it bold and 22 pixels. Use a span or a paragraph with the right class. Heading tags are structural, not decorative.
Usually happens because someone deleted the H3 above it and never adjusted the level. Google will not penalize you, but a screen reader user lands on the H4 expecting it to be a subsection of an H3 that does not exist. Confusing and fixable in 30 seconds.
Common in older themes. Your H1 ends up being your site name on every single page, which means every page tells Google the same thing about its primary topic. The H1 should describe the page, not the brand.
An H2 wrapping an SVG icon with no text alternative. The DOM has a heading element but there is nothing for a screen reader or extractor to read. Either add visually hidden text or do not use a heading at all.
Headings are cheap to fix and expensive to ignore. The team that takes 20 minutes to clean up a page outline tends to be the same team that catches the broken canonical and the missing alt text on the way through. Treat this tool as a quick sanity check, not a rankings lever, and you will get the right amount of value out of it.